Where to begin? Let's start with the good. The space was great: small and intimate albeit with horrible parking (news flash: this is not New York). They gave us a few complimentary amuse bouche to hold us over until the real deal came out. The beautiful canape-like things on top is a pumpernickel round topped with pickled root vegetables with creme fraiche and sour cream balls, sprinkled with some wild herbs and flowers. The root veggies included beets and turnips, and ever so slightly pickled so they weren't too strong. The combination worked in this case and it was definitely a sight to behold on the wooden cutting boards they were presented in.
The dessert, which combined a form of white chocolate coriander ice cream with elderflower granita and beets cut into tiny little squares was probably one of the most interesting and well-executed dish of the evening. It had an unusual flavors bursting with each scoop and I always love the interplay between sweet and savory in desserts. The blood red beets against the backdrop of the snow white (it looks like slush!) was also stunning in its contrast.
Now for the unremarkable: the Hirame, kobujime, toasted buckwheat, ume kombu tea (plum kelp tea), plum sorrel (the greens sprinkled on top). This dish was interesting-sounding in concept but in execution didn't work so well. Sure, it had the crunchy texture and nuttiness from the toasted buckwheat and the silkiness from the rolled up sashimi. While I understand the flavors were delicate, I could barely taste the tea or sorrel because they were so mild. I don't think everything has to be super strong flavored. However, not only was the sashimi itself not super impressive (not fresh or melt-in-your-mouth buttery), but the accompanying flavors and sprinkled buckwheat didn't produce any magic for me.
The first amuse bouche we got were these pear slices floating over a bed of ice filled with sage beer. Again, delicate and refreshing. It would be a decent flavor cleanser. The fresh mint gave the pears a bit of a punch. I liked that it was an unusual attempt at adjoining flavors but not my favorite.
And we have arrived at the bad, the ugly, the unacceptable, the outrageous. Behold this gorgeous piece of short rib. I confess this was the item on the menu that got me the most excited. I even brought my own bottle of red to ensure I'd enjoy this (corkage was $10). The short rib came with salsify, the radish-like veggies that came as a side, and these wonderful potato chips that were fried to perfection. I expected the short rib to be fall-off-the-bone and didn't think of cutting hard into it with my knife when I got far too much resistance for my taste upon my first attempt at slicing. I tried a second time thinking I must have cut into a fatty area that wasn't flesh. But no. The rib was officially and hopelessly hard as rubber with no chance of my cutting into it without exerting all the muscle strength I can muster. This is ridiculous. I huff and puff and loudly crunch into my chips instead as a sad alternative. I try one or two bites, hoping the wine will help to mask the rubbery texture. No luck
I stopped eating it and when asked whether I wanted to box it, I told the server the rib was not cooked properly. Short rib needs to virtually crumble but this one was too hard to eat. The server returned from the kitchen and assured me that the chef insists the rib is cooked right and -- cooked using a sous vide method. Really? That doesn't change the fact that I feel he royally screwed up the main dish of the evening. We got the corkage fee taken off for the bad experience. When I got home, I couldn't wait to braise that baby and did so for hours in wine, water, agave, tomatoes, garlic and some salt. The short rib is happy again.
Another dessert on the house was a sage sorbet on a macaroon with yogurt powder that didn't swing my boat except everyone at our table couldn't get enough of the yogurt powder dusted over the dessert. Some of us wondered out loud whether it's just yogurt powder. And one of us called out the inevitable -- that it had the look of a pile of poop.
The last of the complimentary desserts was a chocolate truffle but it was below average so I stopped eating it after the first bite. My mantra is, why eat something that doesn't taste good? Don't waste your limited calorie intake on sub-par food.
I went the first night, since I helped this pop-up with its food photography, and the one dish that really stood out as memorable and delicious for me was the short rib, which was cooked perfectly. I also really enjoyed the salsify and fried burdock root, and thought all the components worked very well together.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your review, I then asked the manager what was up because I was curious why our experiences were so different.
Unfortunately it seems you went the one night the chefs decided to try a sous vide prepared short rib rather than a braised one. The braised short rib I had was tender and fell right apart.
Since part of the very nature of pop-ups is to experiment rather than serve a fixed (and well tested) menu unfortunately some times some of those experiments don't always work as planned or aren't well received. As is the case with many sous vide items, it's a slow cooked immersion process that's a lot different than braising or grilling so the meat's texture and color is different too. I personally prefer braising so I'm not sure I'd like the sous vide meat either. I braise everything.
Anyway I haven't had the chance to speak with the chef yet, so I'd be interested in getting his perspective as well.
In the nature of pop-ups, the chefs actually changed the menu again, so now the short rib dish is served with a mushroom emulsion and offered as a supplement ("snack") to the fixed menu.
yeah, i'm not surprised. i braised the leftovers at home and it was so much better. the chef that evening, however, insisted that the sous vide was cooked right, notwithstanding that terrible rubbery texture. glad he's not doing it anymore so others don't have to go through what i have. thanks for weighing in!
ReplyDeleteSo I read your review on the Amalur project. I am not from here but it is interesting to me how everyone nowadays has a food blog. Some how that justifies them as an expert, a foodie or gastronome. But I have also learned that most food bloggers are just stroking their large egos or want others to stroke it for them. They simply want attention by letting people falsely know how intelligent they are. Let me ask you something NJ. How long have you been cooking? Do you have a restaurant? Have you owned many in your time? Have you ever done a pop-up? I have only been to two Amalur project dinners but it was enough for me to really admire what they do. First off, pop-ups are not like restaurants. They have no structure. They are NOT meant to have structure. It is a gutsy and renegade style of cooking that you do not see in normal kitchens. Chefs cook in an unfamiliar environment. Something breaks down, something is misplaced or stolen, even sabotaged by the original kitchen staff of the space. They also live as gypsies buying and carrying product back and forth to different places for prep work because they don't have a central kitchen to work out of. Most spaces that allow pop-ups only supply the space for service not preparation. That being said NJ, what are your experiences with cooking at a pop-up? Another egotistical comment is you stating the obvious about you making a conscience effort to ask for the meat and take it home to cook it better is only letting people know that you have a massive cock and that you can run circles around these chefs. I am sure you have heard that old saying " opinions are like assholes, everyone has one?" in this case you are just an asshole. No one gives a shit about how you can cleverly insult a chefs work while trying to sound very intelligent which you are obviously not. One thing is for certain about the amalur project. What they do is love and passion. Technique changes constantly. Like science sometimes it fails and sometimes it prevails. These guys definitely put a lot of thought and emotion in they're food. But just because they go a different route or method in which you do not agree, that doesn't give you the right to publicly put them down just so you can feel good about others listening to you. I too thought the short rib was DIFFERENT. In fact it tasted like a nice medium rare steak. Maybe they should have named it as such or called it ribeye cap which is very similar in texture. EIther way, if I do not agree with something I simply acknowledge it. I don't feel the need to publicly voice they negative part about it which at the end of the day is all relative. What needs to be expressed is the positive so others can share. The negative can be handed. No need to publicize. Let others have their own experience and opinion. The career of a chef is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. SO much blood, sweat and tears are put into the craft when you deal with gastronomy at this level. The chef should have refunded your money and given YOU a tip to go fuck yourself and get educated. Having some respect wouldn't hurt either. I leave you with this quote:
ReplyDelete" Open your mouth only if what you are going to say is more beautiful than silence "
It’s amusing that you decided to wage a personal attack on the messenger rather than make a cohesive argument against my critique. Having love and passion for what they do doesn’t make anyone great at what they do. Having love and passion would, however, make them want to hear honest critique of their food – the good, the bad and the ugly. Passionate people want to improve their skills to the best of their abilities. If they didn’t hear the bad, how would they make their food better? You are taking this rather personally and by censoring the bad and encouraging only the good, you are actually doing your beloved chefs a huge disservice. If you aren’t comfortable reading anything other than glowing, positive reviews of anything, you shouldn’t read blogs at all, or any other reviews for that matter. It’s called freedom of speech. Your personal attack sounds like you’re not shy about spouting negative comments yourself and have no respect for those who disagree with you. But name-calling doesn't get you anywhere. You can do better.
ReplyDelete